5th June 2017
From a sprawling villa in the fashionable Cote d’Azur to a fisherman’s cottage in Pembrokeshire, holiday boltholes are not the preserve solely of the super rich. Many middle income families own a second home and, in the event of a divorce, they fall to be divided, along with all the other capital assets. Resolving who gets what can be difficult, particularly when a holiday home has sentimental or family ties for both parties. Letting go of previous happy memories or dreams of one day retiring there is not always an easy step to take.
If the couple in question is unable to agree on who should keep the property or whether it should go on the market, either of them can ask the court to make this decision on their behalf. The court’s priority is to secure a main home for both adults and any children. Usually, a second home is viewed as a luxury that can be sold to relinquish capital which is needed elsewhere. But, if property prices have dropped dramatically since the time of purchase, it may be in negative equity and too much of a financial burden to maintain. It could be a poisoned chalice that neither party wishes to take on, in which case, the court has to allocate responsibility fairly by considering each individual’s needs and the resources available to them.
A recent High Court case involving a dispute over a couple’s holiday home in County Galway illustrates the regrettable reality when both partners contest who will be granted sole ownership. The husband is claiming he wants to keep the property for his fishing pursuits and the wife, who has ancestral ties to the area, is desperate to retain her home in the small ‘one horse town’. They await judgement. If the court concludes that a transfer to either of them will not produce a fair outcome, then that leaves only one option – a sale.
Judith Fitton is a Family Law Partner at Mundays. For more information contact email@example.com | 01932 590 557
Sophie Banks looks at a recent case where annual leave had not being taken and carried over, but entitled to the accumulative pay on termination
Andrew Knorpel looks at the trouble "alternative facts" can get you in when used in lieu of the truth
Property highlights following the Autumn Budget 2017