25th July 2018
Although the judgment will have to be unpicked over the coming days and weeks, essentially the Judges have been satisfied that the law has been applied correctly. Allowing someone to remain married, when their spouse clearly wants the marriage to end, seems like something out of The Handmaid’s Tale. However, the fact is that the Judges’ hands are tied by the law as made by Parliament.
If some good is to come from this case, it will be in pushing forward the no fault divorce debate. What is needed is a fundamental change in how couples prove their marriage has come to an end, to remove the need for there to be an “offending” party.
It’s no secret that divorces are best managed when the separating couple co-operate with each other. However, the current divorce process requires one person to list examples of the spouse’s unreasonable behaviour during the marriage. This is clearly not conducive to creating an environment in which the separating couple can calmly and sensibly figure out how to move on with their lives.
The contents of this update are intended as guidance for readers. It can be no substitute for specific advice. Consequently we cannot accept responsibility for this information, errors or matters affected by subsequent changes in the law, or the content of any website referred to in this update. © Mundays LLP 2018.
Sophie Banks considers the use of employee images for marketing purposes under the GDPR and DPA 2018, and what steps an employer should take to prevent complaints of unlawful processing of data in this situation.
Within this edition of Mundays Business update you will find legal articles that we hope you will find useful and help you understand when you might need to seek legal advice.
Fiona Moss examines the approach to exchanging business cards under the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)