Don’t Let Procedure Catch You Out
11th April, 2019
Céline Winham looks at a number of recent cases that have highlighted the importance of following a fair procedure when dealing with dismissals, especially in relation to the disciplinary and…
A City trader has won her appeal against a High Court order, awarding her husband an equal division of the matrimonial capital, after a marriage of just four years.
Julie Sharp, a City trader, argued that as both parties had worked, there were no children and they had largely kept their finances separate, it would be unfair to award her ex-husband Robin Sharp part of her £10.5 million bonuses.
The Court of Appeal agreed and Mr Sharp’s award was cut by £700,000, leaving him with just 28 % of the assets overall.
The judgment is likely to make it easier for parties to argue that in suitable cases, there should not be automatic sharing of the wealthier party’s non-family assets. The equal sharing principle established in the case of White v White in 2000 should not be treated as a strict formula and the Court must pay regard to the length of the marriage and the way in which the parties had organised their finances.
The case is likely to affect many divorcing parties currently in negotiations as to the split of their assets and Mundays would be happy to advise if you are unsure about your position. Please contact Judith Fitton, Family Law Partner or any other member of the Family Department at Mundays LLP.
Eleanor Griffiths provides an introduction to the key concepts that any home improver, self-builder or developer should consider when starting a project.
Andrew Knorpel looks at serious cases of alleged misconduct and you what to consider if looking to suspend an employee